I love electronic technology.
I haven’t always been an early adopter, but I am usually in
the 2nd wave of technology users. I’ve had a PC since 1987, got my
first cell phone (it looked like a walkie-talkie) in 1993, and an iPhone 1 in
2007. Currently I’m typing on a MacBook with an iPad next to the computer
waiting for a FaceTime call.
With that background, what I’m about to confess may not make
much sense.
My confession is I’m also working very hard to be sure that
technology doesn’t invade all corners of my life. I’m very conscious that without
boundaries, anyone can allow technology to infiltrate every aspect of their
lives, resulting in the all too familiar scene of people checking FaceBook or
Twitter every time there is a lull in a conversation.
Since it’s Christmas break and my kids are out of school
I’ve been picking up DVD’s at my local library. Over the past two nights we’ve
watched a couple sci-fi films about technology and the future. The first was I
Robot, a film about consciousness in machines – “the ghost in the machine” as
the film says. What do we do when the machines decide that the best way to
protect humanity is to eliminate some of us?
Last night it was The Island, a film about human cloning and
what happens when “the product” realizes he or she is a person, not only a
clone.
In both films technology has morphed into something evil. In
I Robot, the hero, played by Will Smith, has always had skepticism about robots
and the way they have infiltrated society. In The Island, the business people
who make a fortune selling living “insurance policies” resort to murder to
protect their position and role.
These are extreme films and we obviously aren’t at this
point, but what are the signs that society is moving into this direction? Is
E-learning one way? At this point we are using real human instructors and
simply allowing the web to be the carrier of information from one person to the
next (or class).
But what about the medium through which this information is
transmitted? Mobile technology allows all of us the simplicity of checking in
wherever we are. I enjoy using FourSquare and Yelp, or Twitter and Facebook, and
even though my daughter says I’m too old, I have an Instagram account. As an
adult with years of experience (and hopefully wisdom) I know I need to be aware
of what I post and where my information is going. But what about our kids? I
worry sometimes about my two teenagers who are growing up in a 24/7 switched on
world. Will they have the discernment necessary to survive in this environment?
I talk to them about their posts, I caution them about
putting too much information out there for others to see and potentially use
against them. More than anything I worry that for them, “normal” is being able
to access the web whenever and however they want. I believe this can be a good
thing, as long as discernment and boundaries are in place.
So why all the doom and gloom? I simply want to be
discerning. I want to enter this course with eyes open to the wonderful tools
for learning that are out there. I want to glean as much as I can. At the same
time, I want to come with a healthy bit of skepticism, technology won’t solve
all our problems and the best way to learn is still life-on-life, person-to-person.
If technology can help facilitate those connections. I’m in.
#edcmooc
I agree with you that we need to teach young people discernment - it is my opinion that critical literacy is a key skill that all students in the 21st century must have.
ReplyDeleteYes, Kay- you're right and you say it well, I like the phrase "critical literacy'. Thanks
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely agree with you both - but also that we need to be able to live real lives that have the same urgency and vibrancy as the digital... but market forces not really helping here! Best,
ReplyDeleteSandra